“Flesh and Finitude”

Preview: 27th of October, 6-9pm
Continues 28th October – 11th November
Thursday – Sunday 12-5pm

The exhibition, “Flesh and Finitude”, borrowed from Cary Wolfe’s book, What is Posthumanism (2010) explores the boundaries of human life and body. What is the end of the human and where does something else begin?
This year’s NEoN festival’s theme is ‘Lifespans’ and our exhibition’s aim is to investigate the ‘posthuman condition’, the lifespan of “human” as we know it.

Five artists were invited to provide different points of enquiry into what it means to be human in relation to other species, Nature, objects, technology, and humanity itself.

“Not all of us can say, with any degree of certainty, that we have always been human, or that we are only that.” (Rosi Braidotti, The Posthuman (2013) p.1) Today, when artificial intelligence, 3D printed organs and genetic engineering are a reality, what it means to be human is extended and redesigned. At the same time, technological advancement also reflects on our relationship (and most importantly similarities) with the Other.

Digital and sculptural works reflect on different aspects of human and its boundaries, its uncanny symbiotic relationship with others, held together by a melancholic sense of uncertainty.

curated by Zsofia Jakab

Caitlin Dick

Through the advent of the internet and the developments in the way we communicate, our ability to interact has been altered and the speed at which we communicate has exceeded society’s capacity to take in information. What would once be of major concern to the health of the individual is no longer a concern; our technological addiction has melted into everyday life, becoming a monotonously accepted as part of what normality looks like.

Technology has become an extension of ourselves, no longer a separate entity; we feel lost or uneasy when we are without it. The expectation of connection to anything and anyone at any time and for it then to be reciprocated immediately is an assumed part of capitalist consumer culture.

Not only do we need to be accessible 24/7, we also believe that it is essential to be constantly active as part of our techno-ego.

My work attempts to explore these matters in a playfully cynical way, experimentally introducing object-based installations which highlight our relationship with the bizarre cyborg human form. Technology of the flesh a state of posthuman which is ever binded to consumerism and capital. A reality which is infinitely plastic. It displays our propagating connectivity, driven by the twitching, fidgeting hum of our digital addiction. This light-hearted approach seeks to discuss technology’s inherent neutrality with the application of human tendency for addiction that dictates the moral label that is attached.

Caitlyn Main

Caitlyn Mains practice operates from a state of uncertainty: through sustained linguistic unravelling and temporal installation, she presents works that speak of intimacy, agitation and balance. She accommodates, and indeed, propagates conditions encouraging fragility: every piece has the potential to collapse in on itself, and contains obvious indications of temporality. The work is a physical manifestation of precariousness – the use of dangling, leaning, bound and suspended elements serves to underline the flimsiness of matter.

Mains compositions reverberate between a situation of familiarity and abstraction. As firm edges become dissolved, or ignored, the parameters of her work seem to become floppy, saggy, and fluid – seeping outward to be absolved into the daily mass of visual information that surrounds us. The flesh of her assemblages is that of the world – the bones and tendons extrapolated from the domestic and the detrital, from our illuminated back lit phone screens and the phrases uttered to one another. Her frantic constellations continually oscillate between contradictory states: they are simultaneously saturated and empty, humorous, pathetic, sexual, exquisite and insignificant.

Rodrigo Arteaga

I aim to redefine some notions and ideas around nature and culture, considering what sort of division can exist between them. I have used material culture that comes from science and its varied systematic methods in the form of books, maps, diagrams, furniture and tools. There is some inherent contradiction in this effort to bring together order and disorder, the useful and the useless, unearthing the coded enigmas of our relationship to the environment. I have responded to scientific culture in an attempt to embrace its limits, maybe turn it back onto itself, finding a crack, subjectivizing something meant to be objective.

Alicia Fidler

My practice expands how aesthetics of an object can be used to allude to the presence of action and a premise for performance.

Functionality and Agency are contexts, which I employ to transcend an object’s still state. Adopting motifs such as handles, hooks, hinges, nets, harnesses and hoops, I dip into our preexisting relationships with objects and actions. Using Function as a guide for how the body enters the work. ‘Where the handle meets the hand to produce the thing’.

Interaction is my crux, the genesis. I am fascinated by the anticipation and desire for engagement with sculpture. Changing and twisting the nature of the body and the object, into a moment caught in time. I make works, which in every sense give instructions and demand usage but are so still. Wrapped up in potentiality. Stalling the moment of activity, producing an object that screams its performative past and future out.

Recently working with visual suggestion, I have begun to use photographs of past performances. Distorting them with pattern and abstraction. Absorbing images directly onto materials. Re- digesting the echoes of action, presenting a twisted instruction.

Through self-referencing, function and performance my work has become anthropomorphic. The sculptures embody their own Agency through visual clues.

They play out their own situations and actions extending beyond the tools, objects and apparatus they resemble. I move from the realms of interaction, into works that represent a single moment;


Callum Johnstone

Callum Johnstone’s practice explores environmental collapse and the implications it will have on humanity. Knowing that our environment is changing at an accelerated pace due to climate change, humanity must quickly adapt by re-imagining and re-designing the structures in which we live. Johnstone aims to show that it is not the physical structures alone which must change, by also the underlying structures of our society which need to be rethought. Though his work is primarily understood as sculpture, it

often verges on the boundaries of architecture and design. His structures often incorporate repeating modular elements which allow the potential for a continuation, acting simply as a beginning component to a much larger superstructure. These ideas can then extend to the actions of the individual which as a collective become a greater movement and have the potential to alter society as we know it. Johnstone sees himself not only as a commentator and illustrator of current events but also as a module of the superstructure we call society. As a catalyst of ideas, the artist intends to inspire a conversation on ways in which humanity may adapt to imminent environmental threats.